Site Login

Site Login

Your Center For TBA News


151 Posts found
Previous • Page 8 of 16 • Next
Posted by: Carla Leow on May 3, 2024

 

On Friday, May 3, 2024, the Toledo Bar Association (TBA) hosted area students to celebrate Law Day at the TBA in downtown Toledo. Earlier this year, area students were invited to participate in an essay writing contest focused on the American Bar Association’s (ABA) 2024 Law Day theme, "Voices of Democracy.” The winner of each division is awarded a cash prize by the Toledo Bar Association Foundation (TBAF) and published below. The nine winners and their teachers are listed below:

Division I:          Grades 11 & 12
1st Place:           Samantha Budas 

                                Sylvania Southview High School, Teacher: Brad Oatman
2nd Place            Hannah Mock
                                Northwest Ohio Classical Academy, Teacher: Geoff Kujawa
3rd Place             Kate Harkey 
                                Notre Dame Academy, Teacher: Casey Feldstein

Division II:         Grades 9 & 10
1st Place:            Sol Bosio

                                Sylvania Northview High School, Teacher: Kylie Little
2nd Place            Alexander Ban 
                                Perrysburg High School, Teacher: Hua Liu    
3rd Place             Ken Liu
                                Chinese School, Teacher: Hua Liu

Division III:         Grades 7 & 8
1st Place             Kevin Reams 

                                West Side Montessori School, Teacher: Whitney Hardin
2nd Place            Angelica Willow Teets
                                West Side Montessori School, Teacher: Whitney Hardin
3rd Place             Joel Bersee 
                                 Northwest Ohio Classical Academy, Teacher: Geoff Kujawa

 

Pictured left to right: Samantha Budas, Hannah Mock, Sol Bosio, Kevin Reams, Angelica Willow Teets, Joel Bersee, Mayor Wade Kapszukiewicz, and Cindy M. Kirby, Esq.


 

Each essay was judged based upon format, clarity, style, reasoning, creativity, and overall effort. For the first round, essays were reviewed by volunteer attorneys Anne Brossia, Valerie Fatica, Twila Ferguson , Jim Hoppenjans, Bill Maloney, Allma Miller, Florence Murray, Zahraa Nasser, Emily Samlow , Jeffrey Simpson, Ben Syroka, Ashley Weis, and Lucinda Weller. The top essays were then submitted to a judge’s panel for final review to Hon. Myron C. Duhart, Hon. Christine E. Mayle, and Hon. Gene A. Zmuda.

Cindy M. Kirby, Assistant Dean for Student at the University of Toledo College of Law and President of the TBA presented the students with awards on Friday, May 3, 2024 at the TBA’s 2024 Caty Armstrong Memorial Law Day Essay Contest Luncheon. Mayor Wade Kapszukiewicz delivered the Law Day Address after the awards presentation.

 

Introduction to the Essay Theme:
The 2024 Law Day theme “Voices of Democracy” recognizes that in democracies, the people rule. For nearly 250 years, Americans have expressed their political views and wishes by speaking their minds and voting in elections. In 2024, the United States will hold its 60th presidential election, and Americans will address fundamental questions about democracy and the rule of law.

The Voices of Democracy Law Day theme encourages Americans to participate in the 2024 elections by deepening their understanding of the electoral process; discussing issues in honest and civil ways; turning out to vote; and, finally, helping to move the country forward after free and fair elections. In this way, Americans ensure that our government remains responsive to the wishes of the people. We invite all Americans to join us on May 1, 2024, to celebrate Law Day by lifting their voices to strengthen our democracy.

 

Essay Question:
Your ideas could help make our democracy better.  Propose ideas that can help to level the playing field, promote fairness, and ensure that every voice is heard, respected, and counted.

 

Division I: 11th & 12th Grades, 1st Place
Carpe Diem! Seize the Day to Inspire Tomorrow
by Samantha Budas, Sylvania Southview High School; Teacher: Brad Oatman

Our country is one not only controlled and influenced by prominent figures in power such as the President of the United States or the Supreme Court Justices but by the voices of civilians across the country. When you take a deeper look at these influencing voices; however, the diversity of them is greatly unbalanced and has, in some cases, forced many to refrain from participating in elections and hence leave their voices unheard.


The solution to this disparity is not to just push more people to vote through legalizing voter registration incentives or diversifying the methods in which Americans can vote in elections. It is instead to give the American people a reason to vote. This can be a cause to vote for or a person who is representative of a group of voters and their experiences or hardships or successes. The solution to leveling the playing field is to diversify the candidates and make room for diverse voices. This can be accomplished through leadership programs that are not only intended to target more diverse or minority communities but anyone who wants to use their voice for the better to make a difference. To inspire and inform future generations is the most beneficial way to accomplish change. The younger generations can bring about the change that is necessary to ensure that every voice is heard only by making sure that those joining the government understand the power behind their voices.


The real question is, would programs like this truly have an impact on the voting population and balance? Just because future generations can run for President or take on similar leadership roles doesn't mean it will encourage more people to vote. This is easily disproven when comparing voter tum out between the 2004 and 2008 Presidential elections. When Barack Obama, the U.S. 's first African American president, ran in 2008, approximately 2 millions more African Americans voted compared to the previous election. During the 2008 election, African American voters went from making up 11 % of all voters to 12.1 % and this trend continued during the 2020 election (U.S. Census Bureau). Although the final two candidates were both white, African Americans made up 13% of all voters, proving that all it takes is for one candidate to bring a large group of people together to unite them under the idea of making a difference and those people will continue to work and inspire others to bring about change.


Statistics like this prove that what the United States needs to do to level the playing field is not establishing voter registration incentives or diversifying voting methods but by educating its citizens and establishing programs that will help to diversify the voting pool. This is because when people can see themselves or their experiences in a candidate, it makes them feel more seen alongside wanting to show their support and vote. Diversification is necessary for the United States because when new people come to the table, new ideas come as well.

 

Division II: 9th & 10th Grades, 1st Place
Nationalizing Patterns of Equality, Awareness, and Involvement
by Sol Bosio, Sylvania Northview High School; Teacher: Kylie Little

Currently, our nation elects presidential candidates through a bipartisan democracy which devalues voters and candidates outside these monopolizing and overemphasized political parties. Through the nationalization of redistricting commissions, we can promote equality and demote gerrymandering1 which occurs through the excess bias and political power of certain political
figures. By eliminating gerrymandering and ensuring the quality of our voting system through the lawful establishment of Congressional Districts the quality of our democracy would escalate greatly. Additionally, I suggest that guidelines regarding the presidential campaigning system are solidified to promote political transparency, incorruption, and depolarization within our voting
system.


I suggest that our nation first develop a criteria that draws the Congressional District lines in direct accordance with population, regional values, and opinions to better represent a population and eliminate gerrymandering. The criteria would include the amount of people in a set district and would consider which areas of a state are shaped similarly in political and moral values, keeping in mind income, urbanization, population, economic status, and family size. A citizen from each Congressional District, within a state, would be represented to draw the Congressional District lines thus nationalizing Independent Redistricting Commissions. Through these minor elections the representatives would further explain the task of redistricting, promote the foundational characteristics of democracy, and elaborate with a nonpartisan goal to educate the public about how political figures could contain bias and sabotage the equity, civility, and impartiality of future elections. This process of redrawing the Congressional District lines would 1 The arranging of specific territories for federal redistricting purposes in a way that gives a certain political party an
advantage within the election. The name comes from the politician Elbridge Gerry who created a Congressional District in the shape of a salamander to benefit his political party in the presidential election of I 812. be considered a necessity to promote fair representation that would be updated every 10 years as populations fluctuate, as per the United States Constitution.


Additionally, I suggest that we create a criteria of which the candidates of the presidential election must abide by to promote democracy and to encourage the promotion of knowledge and nationalism rather than sectarianism. The criteria would include that if a candidate publicizes denigrating or indecorous claims regarding themselves or other candidates the claim would be investigated and deemed truthful or false. The validation of the claim would be publicized, by the Federal Communications Commission, to promote truth and transparency while avoiding a conflict with the candidate's First Amendment rights. I also suggest that voting ballots for the presidential election would exclude the candidate's political party. A candidate would also be prohibited from publicizing their political party, rather they would promote their goals through the presidency for the betterment of our nation. Rather than being viewed as unconstitutional, prohibiting political party identities would be promoted as a connection to the origins of our country and would be instated as a necessary limit to prevent political discrimination. By minimizing the role of political parties within our democracy we can better coalign with the interests of our first President, George Washington', through a partisan democracy and choosing the morals and goals that we, as individuals, support thus encouraging many to learn about our political climate rather than merely voting with their apparent party despite knowledge of said party's intentions within office.


2 The United States Senate Historical Office wrote that, "Washington feared that they[Political parties] carried the seeds of the nation's destruction through petty factionalism." Washington ardently spoke about how political parties could destroy a prosperous country just as they are doing currently through political discrimination and sectarianism. Factionalism is the state of a government, system, or group of people being divided, in a destmctive manner, by groups of people with opposing views.

 

Division III: 7th & 8th Grades, 1st Place
Problems with Voting Rights and Our Democracy
by Kevin Reams, West Side Montessori School; Teacher: Whitney Hardin

Democracy has been part of the United States since the 1630s and ever since then it has evolved our freedom and rights. Democracy has had many different changes throughout history but it still isn't perfect. There are still flaws in democracy, especially in voting. Not everyone's voice in elections ls heard. Many of these voices include people who have committed a felony, people who live in U.S. territories, and homeless people. People's voices need to be heard during elections in order to better improve our democracy.


People who have committed a felony are just one of the many people whose voices can't be heard during elections. People who have committed a felony usually spend over a year In prison, that is, If they don't get sentenced to death. But during their sentence in some states they aren't allowed to vote, but in other states they can even not be allowed to vote for that sentence. Some states will even not let them vote for the rest of their lives. This isn't fair for these people, especially If they are wrongly convicted of the felony. This law should change in these states in order to be fair towards these people.


Another group of people who aren't allowed to vote in United States elections are people from U.S. territories. The U.S. territory citizens should be allowed to vote because, though they are not states, they follow rules from the United States. 'I1tls means that they should have some part in elections that could affect their homes and their lives. The citizens living in the United States territories should be able to vote but only for things that could affect what happens to them. Just because United States territories aren't American states doesn't mean they shouldn't vote on things that could be related to them.


A lot of homeless people, and others who have major financial Issues have problems when it comes to voting, The homeless and others with similar financial problems can give their shelter address to vote but some homeless people don't live in shelters. They would also have to buy an ID, and though they are cheap, people want to spend their money on essential things like food, water, and clothing. Some people also don't live dose to a polling station, and they need money for transportation which they probably can't afford. Homeless people and people with major financial problems should have better privileges when it comes to voting.


Our modern democracy makes it so not everyone's voices are heard during elections. There needs to be changes put Into places to better help these people vote. It's just straight up unfair that these people, who follow United States laws and rules, have a hard time in voting and some just can't vote at all. Homeless people, people who have committed a felony, and people who live in United States territories all need better rights when it comes to voting. Democracy needs a change in voting rights.

 

About Law Day
Law Day was established by President Eisenhower in 1958 to honor the law and is celebrated annually on or around May 1st by bar associations and the legal profession nationwide.

The essay contest for students has been an integral part of Law Day festivities for many years. This annual contest encourages youth to explore our legal system and the relationship between laws and our rights and freedoms. The Toledo Bar Association contest was named the Caty Armstrong Law Day Essay Contest after Caty’s tragic death in an automobile accident in 1993 just weeks after she was recognized as an essay contest winner.

The TBA’s Law Related School Education Committee’s mission is to develop and implement programs designed to assist all levels of our educational system in the education of students in our community about the legal system and the system of justice, including the organization of various Law Day activities and Mock Trial programs.

About the Toledo Bar Association
The Toledo Bar Association (TBA) is a voluntary professional association of lawyers in Lucas and surrounding counties. It was established in 1878 and has over 1,500 members. The mission of the TBA is to advance the highest standards of excellence for the legal profession, promote the rule of law, facilitate equal access to justice, and consciously foster a diverse and inclusive legal community, by providing unmatched collaborative opportunities, professional development and outstanding services to our members while also supporting the community at large.

Posted by: Carla Leow on May 2, 2024

2024-2025 Nominations

First Vice President:
Craig M. Witherell
  
Second Vice President:
Robert C. Tucker


Secretary: 
Kyle A. Silvers
  
Treasurer: 
Jeremiah P. O’Brien
  
Board: 
Mag. Carmille L. Akande
Rebecca Facey
Hon. Eric A. Marks
Samantha M. Meiers
Thomas J. Schaffer
Karl E. Strauss
Andrea R. Young
Meira F. Zucker


  
The 2024 Annual Meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 4, 2024.
Under the Toledo Bar Association Code of Regulations, First Vice President Adam S. Nightingale, will become president for 2024-2025.  
 
Electronic Voting
In accordance with Article VIII, Section 2, a ballot and instructions for voting will be sent to the members by electronic means, on or about May 2, 2024.

  • All full members and retired members of the Toledo Bar Association will receive a ballot via the email address on file with the TBA. 
  • Biographies of each candidate will be posted on the Toledo Bar’s website, linked above. 
  • A personal link will be generated for each member to the ballot on the TBA’s polling site. Links are not transferable and may be used only once. 
  • Voting is completely anonymous and secure. 
  • Members who do not have an email address or who may be inconvenienced by electronic voting may request a paper ballot to be mailed. Please contact Carla Leow at 419-244-1044 or cleow@toledobar.org. 
  • Questions may be directed to Toledo Bar Association Executive Director, Brad Lagusch, at 419-242-9363 or blagusch@toledobar.org
Posted by: Carla Leow on May 1, 2024

In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, the intersection of technology and law represents a critical juncture for legal professionals, including lawyers and judges of the Toledo Bar Association. The integration of technological advancements into legal practices is not merely a trend but a profound shift that is reshaping the very fabric of the legal profession. This transformation is driven by the need for greater efficiency, transparency, and access to justice, making it imperative for legal practitioners to stay abreast of emerging technologies and their implications for the law. 

The TBA Technology Committee has happily hosted several CLEs that focus on the intersection of law and technology. The aim is to help advance legal conversations involving challenging technology issues. CLEs on legal issues such as these aim to move the technology needle by allowing for free-flowing discussions where challenges are identified, pros and cons are measured, and ethical implications are debated – all to push for meaningful solutions that can address today’s challenges. 

By embracing technology, legal professionals can lead the way in developing legal frameworks that address 
the novel challenges and opportunities presented by digital innovations, from blockchain and cryptocurrencies to artificial intelligence and beyond. The advent of generative AI technologies, such as ChatGPT, presents a revolutionary tool for lawyers, significantly impacting legal research, document drafting, and client interaction. These AI models can process and synthesize vast amounts of legal information, providing quick insights that were previously unattainable without extensive manual research.
The implications of technology on legal ethics and privacy are profound and require careful consideration. As legal professionals incorporate more digital tools into their practice, they must navigate the complexities of data security, client confidentiality, and the ethical use of technology. This necessitates ongoing education and adherence to updated ethical guidelines that address the challenges posed by the digital age, ensuring that the integrity of the legal profession and the protection of client rights remain paramount.

The importance of ongoing education cannot be overstated. For legal professionals to effectively harness the benefits of technology, continuous learning and professional development are essential. By fostering a culture of learning and adaptation, the association can ensure its members are well-equipped to navigate the technological landscape and leverage these tools to enhance their practice. Law schools, too, should focus on developing courses that cover the use of AI in legal contexts, highlighting both the advantages and limitations of these technologies.

However, the use of generative AI in legal practice is not without ethical considerations. Lawyers must be vigilant about verifying the accuracy of AI-generated information, understanding that these tools, while powerful, can produce errors or overlook nuances in the law. The ethical duty to provide competent representation includes ensuring that any AI-assisted work meets the same standards of reliability as traditionally conducted legal research. Additionally, lawyers must consider issues of confidentiality and data security, particularly when using AI to process sensitive client information. 

The integration of technology into the legal profession represents a significant opportunity for lawyers and judges of the Toledo Bar Association. By embracing technological advancements, legal professionals can enhance the efficiency, accessibility, and effectiveness of their work, leading to a more responsive and equitable legal system. However, this transition also requires a commitment 

to ethical practice, continuous learning, and community engagement. As technology continues to evolve, so will the ways in which legal services are delivered and justice is administered, making it an exciting time to be a part of the legal profession. 

In conclusion, the Toledo Legal Way is a strong ethos in our legal community that recognizes collegial professional relationships between the bench and bar, a deep commitment to pro bono, and fostering advancement for law students, our next generations of lawyers and judges. The Toledo Legal Way is enjoyed by the few who get to enjoy this daily reality and envied by the numerous other lawyers across the globe who constantly hear about this legal way of life. With this spirit, we could also adopt the Toledo Legal Technology Way – focusing on the legal issues involved when utilizing technology, to advance our legal profession and allow our clients to be the ultimate winners. As Toledo is the gold standard for a legal community, so too can it be for the intersection of technology and the law.

Posted by: Carla Leow on Apr 23, 2024

Editor’s Note:  The following are remarks presented by former Toledo Bar Association President John F. Hayward, at the TBA Annual Meeting held in July 1992, which have been edited by Associate Editor Mechelle Zarou.  We present these wise words as a memorial to his passing in January 2024, as well as a reminder that while we have accomplished much of the agenda Mr. Hayward established during his presidency, we still have work to do, and we can do so with the dignity and grace of our profession evoked by these indelible words.

 

TBA Annual Meeting Remarks

Not even Frank Gallagher remembers the founding of the Toledo Bar Association in 1878. After all, he wasn't born until 23 years later, but when he was admitted to the Bar of Ohio in 1925, there were 350 lawyers practicing in this community with a population of 243,000. By 1942, when he was President of this Association, Toledo boasted 460 lawyers and a population of 282,349. When I was admitted to practice in 1966, there were 700 of us; 10 years later, that number had doubled. Today, our Association has 1,620 members and the population is 462,361.

In looking at ourselves historically and trying to see ourselves as others may see us, the comments of Alexis de Tocqueville are instructive. de Tocqueville specifically noted, with his uncanny prescience, the American proclivity for associational response to community interests. In 1840, he said:

Americans are forever forming associations. There are not only commercial and industrial associations...but religious, moral, serious, futile, very general and very limited, immensely large, and very minute...In every case, where in France you would find the government or in England some territorial magnate, in the United States you are sure to find an association.

 

Nothing, in my view, more deserves attention than the intellectual and moral associations in America. Even if we do notice them, we tend to misunderstand them, hardly ever having seen anything similar before. The most democratic country in the world now is that in which men have...carried to the highest perfection the art of pursuing in common the objects of common desires.

 

Another dead guy, Edmund Burke suggested that a healthy civilization exists with three relationships intact. It has a relationship with the present, a relationship with the future, and a relationship with the past. When the past feeds and sustains the present and the future, there is a healthy civilization. It seems appropriate then to reflect today on those relationships inside and outside the Toledo Bar Association.

How does this Association stand in the pursuit of our common desires? Frank Gallagher's presence here today embodies our relationship with those who have preceded us. Our observance, and your presence, validates our present concerns, and the membership numbers I reported verify our future interests.

As a second-generation Toledo lawyer, let me venture to assess where our Association has been, where we are now, and where we are going: an inside/outside state of the Bar, if you will. Let’s start outside, on the other side of the world. One of the big advantages Japan enjoys, we are often told, is that its 20,000 lawyers compare favorably with the million, more or less, of us. In Tokyo or Yokohama, things get done without a lot of complaining and stalling and suing and other inconvenient stuff. In Japan and most of the world, people know their place. They take what the company or the government gives them. They do what they are told. They get with the program -- or else.

Japan also has very few judges, a fact that effectively limits prospects for a young man facing a lifetime in prison, or a paraplegic who has been injured in an accident, or a mother or a father facing the loss of custody of a child, or a doctor anguished by a malpractice claim, or a young woman with an idea for a business that will bring new services, new goods and new jobs to her community.

Most Americans have a love-hate relationship with lawyers, but like us or not, we represent each American's first or last defense against the power of the bigs, whether big government or big corporations.[ZM1]  We Americans are about the only people on earth with the individual power to do such things as making a school in Topeka take in a black kid named Brown or permit a woman named Hill to confront a man named Thomas and keep her job. A distinguished Ohio judge once said, "We dedicated ourselves to a powerful idea -- organic law rather than naked power. There seems to be universal acceptance of that idea in the Nation.”

While Potter Stewart's observation may describe the United States at its ideal best, in the real world of everyday life, we know that some of us are more equal than others. Lawyers work for money, so the odds in any courtroom will usually be against those who don't have much. But to its everlasting credit, the organized Bar of this country during the last decade has done its level best to minimize those odds by keeping the Legal Services Corporation afloat, by maintaining funding for the programs we know as Legal Aid [of Western Ohio] and ABLE and Public Defenders and making those courtroom odds a little shorter for most of the people most of the time.

Recently at a meeting of lawyers, a young woman said, "Let us remember what we are here for. We are here to ensure that this country, this wonderful country, will never again have to live through the repressions of the 1930's." Her name is Lyobuv Kolomenskya, one of the 27,000 lawyers in the former Soviet Union. She was speaking in Moscow, at a meeting to form the first bar association in her country. Surely Alexis de Tocqueville is smiling somewhere, watching Russian lawyers struggling to associate in support of a country ruled by law. Who knows? Someday the Russians and the Japanese might be lucky enough to live in a country with too many lawyers. It's enough to make you proud to be an American.

Locally, we are not the same community we were 50, 25 or even 10 years ago. The momentous shifts in the world economy that have buffeted American manufacturing industries, the core of our local economy during most of this century, swept waves of change over Toledo. It may be that some of our analytical skills would be useful in achieving perspective on those changes in the local economy, even as we go about the daily business of counseling and negotiating and litigating.

In Monday's edition of one of America's great newspapers, the departing dean of the Business College at the University of Toledo played de Tocqueville for Toledo. After two years here, he observed that Toledo's business community and political leadership have been unable to form a team with a united vision, instead waiting for initiatives from the state and federal governments that never come. “There’s already been damage and job loss," he said. "The main thing is, the various elements within Toledo and Lucas County have to come together. The region has to come together effectively as a team. Economic development is like a marriage. It's like anything else in life. You've gotta work at it." He had other advice for Toledo and even exercised his constitutional rights when asked to describe the Toledo business community in one word. "I plead the Fifth Amendment," he said.

Another thoughtful observer of our community, actually employed briefly by The Blade, Keith Burris, offered more specific comments on his departure a couple of years ago. …Toledo is, he said, "one of the few American cities where you can actually live - not just hassle out a living each day." But he noted three things he will not miss about Toledo: cronyism, self-absorbed negativism, and resistance to change. He found much worth preserving here but said Toledoans must first stop putting their community down. He asked, "Will this be a city where the way it has always been is insisted upon, or can it be a place that both remembers the past and welcomes the future?"

Parenthetically, having referenced the local newspaper, I feel compelled to pass on the following observation by a great American whose family was in the newspaper business, while speaking to a meeting of journalists: “It's not honest convictions honestly stated that concern me. Rather, it is the tendency of many papers...to argue editorially from the personal objective, rather than from the whole truth. As the old jury lawyer said: ‘And these, gentlemen, are the conclusions on which I base my facts.’”

That was Adlai Stevenson speaking.[ZM2] 

What about the inside? What can we do? What can the members of this Association individually and collectively do in support of our common professional interests, and the larger interests of our community? I submit we can do a number of things. By respecting the past, specifically the traditions of this Bar Association and its innate practicality, we have instructive stories to tell and good examples to set regarding professionalism, alternative dispute resolution, legal aid and public interest law, and all the other buzz words and newly hatched definitions consultants and PR flacks inflict on us. Look for a moment if you will at the back of your program and note the committees of this Association focused on service: AIDS Assistance, Citizens Dispute Settlement, Legal Aid and Poverty Law, Minorities in the Profession, Pro Bono, Law Related School Education, Alternative Dispute Resolution, not to mention Lawyers Assistance, and Professionalism. Think for a moment of the volunteer assistance members of this Association offer to Camp Courageous, Habitat for Humanity and the St. Patrick’s Soup Kitchen, not to mention the countless unreported and uncompensated individual examples of legal services rendered daily by members of this Association to their fellow citizens.

Where do we hope to be a year hence? What should the priorities for the TBA be in the 12 months ahead? Bearing in mind Yogi Berra’s indisputable dictum that the future ain't what it used to be, your Board of Trustees will convene for its annual retreat in September to formulate some specific goals in that regard. We will look at ideas for broader membership services, for law library improvements, for growth of the Toledo Bar Foundation, at prospects for a bench and bar conference to foster good communication between our judges and the trial bar, and for ways to more effectively respond to the unmet legal needs of our fellow citizens who thus far lack representation. I invite your suggestions and ideas in that regard and I pledge full consideration of them.

What can individual lawyers do to maintain and advance respect for this legal system dedicated to the advancement of justice? First, we can generate respect by doing those things that deserve respect. Second, we can deal with each other, and with each other’s clients, in a professional manner that shows respect and courtesy without sacrificing any of the zealousness we owe our clients. Third, we can communicate with our clients to keep them aware of what is going on, and finally, we can educate the public about the legal process and the role that lawyers play.[ZM3] 

It is useful for the present and for the future to assess our relationship to the past. We are not just playing music by dead guys. Efforts encompassed today under the rubric of alternative dispute resolution continue a proud tradition described as follows: “Discourage litigation. Persuade your neighbors to compromise whenever you can. Point out to them how the nominal winner is often the real loser -- in fees, and expenses, and waste of time. As a peacemaker, the lawyer has a superior opportunity of being a good man (or woman). There will still be business enough.” Abraham Lincoln said that.

We need to respect that which we inherit and prepare to hand it on to the next generation. It is more difficult, perhaps, to articulate our own experience. What a person knows at 50 that he or she did not know at 20 is for the most part incommunicable. The knowledge acquired with age is not the knowledge of formulas or forms of words, but of people, places, action -- a knowledge not gained by words but by touch, sight, sound, victories, failures, sleeplessness, devotion, love…the human experiences and emotions of this earth and of one's self and of other men and women and perhaps, too, a little faith and a little reverence for the things you cannot see.

Let us remember day to day that law is but the means; justice is the end. It is a special privilege to practice a profession that enables us to become a part of the most important crises and the most important opportunities of our clients’ lives; to represent that young man facing the prospect of a lifetime in prison; to represent that paraplegic who has been injured in an accident; to represent that mother or father facing the loss of custody of a child; to represent that doctor anguished by a malpractice claim or to represent that entrepreneur who would bring new services, new goods, and new jobs to Toledo. If we remember the past, welcome the future, and challenge each other daily to remember that it is a privilege we exercise, we will do each other proud.

In the firm belief that the more you say, the less people remember, let me close with a prayer. It is attributed to the Irish, but it fits the needs of all beleaguered minorities:

 

May those that love us, love us;

And those that don't love us, may God turn their hearts;

And if he doesn't turn their hearts, may he turn their ankles;

So we'll know them by their limping.

 

We are adjourned.

 

 

Posted by: Carla Leow on Apr 3, 2024

A Remote Online Notary (RON) in Ohio, exclusively available through Ohio Notary Services — a company co-owned by the Toledo Bar Association — is a Notary Public authorized to conduct notarizations remotely using approved technology, such as webcams. To become an online notary in Ohio, one must undergo a background check, complete an online course, pass a test, and obtain necessary equipment. Benefits of becoming a RON include convenience for clients, maintaining social distance, quicker notarizations, enhanced security measures, eco-friendly practices, and the ability to offer video recordings of the process. 

Learn more at Ohio Notary Services LLC.

Posted by: Carla Leow on Apr 3, 2024

Public opinion of democratic institutions has plummeted since the beginning of the COVID pandemic. Courts have not been immune to this phenomenon. How do we address this? Research suggests that procedural fairness matters more to individuals before the court than outcome favorability (whether someone won or lost in court) or outcome fairness (whether they should have won or lost).
  
Studies indicate that procedural fairness increases an individual’s willingness to accept and follow a court’s decision, now and in the future. Studies also indicate that fair processes and procedures also influence how people evaluate judges, court staff and the legal system as a whole. We can enhance public trust and confidence in the legal system and improve compliance simply by amplifying a few practices.

Voice. 
People want to have the opportunity to tell their side of the story in their own words before decisions are made. This includes decisions about bond, next court dates, guilt or innocence, and sentencing. When preparing your case, take time to listen to your client about what they think is important to share with the court. We all have limited time and a lot of work. A good practice to manage time is to require what is shared be related to the case at hand and not repetitive.  

Neutrality. 
People want to know that decisions are based on rules that are applied consistently across people and across different cases. It’s important to take time to explain the “why” behind process and procedure. When we tell people “that’s the way we do it” or “because that’s the rule” we are missing an opportunity to build understanding and trust. It’s important to use plain language. We can be as fair as possible, but if people don’t understand what is happening and why, we don’t get the full benefit of our efforts.   

Respect. 
People want to be treated with the courtesy and respect that is given to a person in good standing in the community. Respect includes respect for their rights and time. Coming prepared to court sends a message of respect to your client, opposing counsel, and the court. Minimizing continuances is a great way to be respectful of people’s time. If you are going to be late, make sure you communicate that to your client and the court. Feel free to apologize as well. Explanation about timeliness avoids incorrect assumptions (like you don’t care) and helps maintain respect in less-than-ideal circumstances.

Trust. 
People want to know that legal professionals are sincere and caring, and that they are trying to do the right thing as determined by the facts and the law. Practicing the first three elements helps build the fourth element. So does humanizing the process when possible. Acknowledging our own limitations helps do this.     
   
If we treat defendants, victims and witnesses with procedural justice they are more likely to have a favorable opinion of lawyers, judges and the courts. It also means that people are more likely to follow the orders of the court (i.e., show up for court dates, complete probation successfully, pay fines and costs, follow no contact orders). This compliance is sustained over time. Even after a case is concluded, an individual who experiences procedural justice is more likely to comply with the law, not commit new crimes, report for jury duty, or agree to testify as a witness.

Toledo Municipal Court strives to build an environment where procedural justice is prioritized and practiced. It’s incorporated into our organizational vision and values. We have a training wand public defender staff that provide a full day training of procedural justice for court and clerk staff as well as staff from the public defenders’ and prosecutors’ office. TMC provided free CLE on procedural fairness in 2019 and hopes to do so again this fall.
 

 

Posted by: Carla Leow on Apr 3, 2024

Thursday, June 20, 2024 
The Pinnacle, Maumee, Ohio
To Register: www.ablelaw.org/A2J-support 

AWARD WINNERS: 

- Community Advocacy Award: Hon. Ian B. English 

- Community Advocacy Award: Mom’s House, Christina Rodriguez 

- Public Interest Law Award: Hon. Michelle Wagner 

 

Keynote Speaker: Erin Gruwell

This year's featured keynote speaker is Erin Gruwell. Ms. Gruwell is a teacher, author, and education reform activist. She first gained national attention in1998 when she and 150 of her students (known as the freedom writers) appeared on “Prime Time Live” with Connie Chung. In 1999, Ms. Gruwell and the Freedom Writers published “The Freedom Writers Diary” which became a NYT bestseller. Since, she has used her platform to continue to fight for equity and inclusion with her nonprofit, The Freedom Writers Foundation. 

 

 

Posted by: Gina Scherzer on Oct 4, 2023

The Toledo Bar Association announces the results of the poll taken of its members, September 13 through 27, for the upcoming judicial election on Tuesday, November 7, 2023.
A link to an online poll was sent to members of the Toledo Bar Association asking them to rate the candidate as "highly recommended," "recommended," or "not recommended" to serve as judge.

The qualifications were based on integrity, legal ability, legal experience, fair-mindedness, promptness, professionalism, judicial temperament, public and community services, and other qualifications bearing upon their fitness for the office.

Members were instructed to vote only if they had sufficient information concerning the candidate to form an opinion of their qualifications. The poll was sent to 1,331 attorney members. 448 completed the poll for a response rate of 34%.
 
 

 

Highly Recommended

Recommended

Not Recommended

Toledo Municipal Court

 

 

 

Joseph J. Howe

52.53% (156) 40.07% (119) 7.41% (22)

 

 

 

 

Toledo Municipal Court

 

 

 

Nicole Khoury

52.27% (173) 34.14% (113) 13.60% (45)

 

 

 

 

Toledo Municipal Court

 

 

 

Timothy C. Kuhlman

73.24% (260) 23.38% (83) 3.38% (12)

 

 

 

 

Toledo Municipal Court

 

 

 

Michelle A. Wagner

74.78% (252) 21.66% (73) 3.56% (12)

 

 

 

 

Maumee Municipal Court

 

 

 

Daniel G. Hazard

35.66% (92) 48.06% (124) 16.28% (42)

 

 

 

 

Oregon Municipal Court

 

 

 

Louis S. Kovacs

51.79% (130) 39.04% (98) 9.16% (23)

 

 

 

 

Sylvania Municipal Court

 

 

 

Michael A. Bonfiglio

48.73% (173) 22.54% (80) 28.73% (102)

Meira F. Zucker

25.27% (70) 33.21% (92) 41.52% (115)

 

 

 

 

 

 
Posted by: Gina Scherzer on Jul 26, 2023

 

We're proud to announce that the Sisters In Law program is now officially affiliated with the Toledo Bar Association. Further, the organization will expand its pro bono legal services and mentoring to include support for the women and children at Mom's House of Toledo, Bethany House, and YWCA of Northwest Ohio.

Past President Sarah Skow was instrumental in making this partnership a reality. As a Sisters In Law Mentor, she knows firsthand the organization's excellent work in the community. Sisters In Law Founder Gretchen DeBacker will continue to manage the program. You may recall the Sisters In Law Program was the 2018 recipient of the ABLE/LAWO Community Advocacy Award and was awarded the Ohio State Bar Association’s “Outstanding Program of the Year" in 2019.

The Toledo Bar Association is proud to have Sisters In Law as a partner. We see it as a way to continue to expand our Pro Bono advocacy and outreach in the coming years.

 

LEARN MORE
 


Volunteer with Sisters in Law

Would you like to join in the efforts? A commitment of 3-5 hours a month is all it will take to impact the lives of women and children in our area. Volunteer attorneys and non-attorneys are being sought to participate in the Sisters In Law Program. Sisters in Law is hosting a casual info session for those interested in learning more about the program on Thursday, August 3rd.

BECOME A SISTER IN LAW
Thursday, August 3, 2023
5:00 - 6:30 PM
at Toledo Spirits Company
1301 N. Summit St.
Toledo, Ohio 43604
 

RSVP


If you have questions or would like to sign up as a volunteer before the event, please contact Gretchen DeBacker at 419-297-7210 or GretchenDeBackerLaw@gmail.com.

Posted by: Gina Scherzer on Jun 13, 2023


Thank you for joining us for the 84th Annual Joint Ceremony of the Toledo Bar Association, Lucas County Bar Association, Thurgood Marshall Law Association, Toledo Women’s Bar Association to pay tribute to the members of the Bar who have passed away during the last year. The Memorial Committee has released a pre-recorded video below. 

OPENING OF COURT
John A. Coble
    
INVOCATION
Mag. Trevor N. Fernandes 

READ BY
John A. Coble
Krys E. Beech
William G. Meyer
    
ADJOURNMENT
John A. Coble

 


David S. Philipps                               

Time:  0:04:12
May 6, 1938 – March 31, 2022

Admission to bar:  October 19, 1966
William Maloney, Chair        
Daniel Maloney
William Bingle     

Robert V. Sterling        

Time:  0:05:37
April 20, 1944 – May 9, 2022
 
Admission to bar:  October 30, 1971

Ronald Cooperman, Chair
Steve Keller

Alexandria R. Vaneck

Time: 0:09:10
November 4, 1953 – May 20, 2022
Admission to bar:  November 7, 1980
Catherine Garcia-Feehan, Chair
Christopher F. Parker 
Bonnie R. Rankin

Richard W. Hanusz                            

Time:  0:10:18
September 19, 1937 – July 1, 2022
Admission to bar: October 16, 1963
Hon. Dean Mandros, Chair
Mark Hanusz
Pariss Coleman
Hon. Michael Bonfiglio

Tam E. Salsberry                                

Time:  0:14:13
November 12, 1956 – July 2, 2022
Admission to bar:  November 18, 1991
Patricia Rideout, Chair
Tamra Keil
Todd Salsberry

Jerome J. Robison                              

Time:  0:18:24
August 21, 1934 – July 25, 2022
Admission to bar:  May 25, 1961
Craig Frederickson, Chair
Philip Wolf
|Erwin Diener

Donald J. Keune                                

Time:  0:21:14
March 16, 1931 – August 5, 2022
Admission to bar: October 11, 1961
Grant Keune, Chair
Gerald W. Miller
Joseph Wittenberg

Thomas George Zraik                        

Time:  0:24:24
February 18, 1937 – August 13, 2022
Admission to bar:  October 17, 1964
Hon. James G. Carr, Chair
Kenneth L. Mickel
Christopher F. Parker

Gregory G. Alexander                        

Time:  0:27:54
February 12, 1929 – August 24, 2022 
Admission to bar:  October 17, 1964

Edwin G. Emerson, Chair
Members of Shumaker Loop & Kendrick

Julian Oran “Dude” Northcraft         

Time:  0:31:00
September 23, 1923 – August 15, 2022
Admission to bar:  August 24, 1950
Christopher F. Parker, Chair
Catherine Garcia-Feehan
Bonnie Rankin

David D. Murray                                

Time:  0:34:25
September 14, 1945 – September 17, 2022
Admission to bar:  November 4, 1977
Mark J. Sobanski, Chair

Robert Rywalski                                

Time:  0:38:46
November 6, 1938 – September 23, 2022
Admission to bar:  November 2, 1968
Catherine Garcia-Feehan, Chair
Bonnie Rankin
Christopher F. Parker

James M. Morton, Jr.                         

Time:  0:39:46
November 11, 1942 – September 30, 2022
Admission to bar:  October 27, 1967
Marie Suplica, Chair
Hon. Mary Ann Whipple
Scott Janson

Hon. Charles D. Abood                     

Time:  0:43:47
July 17, 1944 – October 22, 2022
Admission to bar:  May 2, 1970
Trish Branam, Chair
Jerry Phillips
George M. Glasser
Members of the Toledo Bar Association

Thomas N. Tomczak                          

Time:  0:49:51
May 7, 1940 – November 11, 2022
Admission to bar:  November 2, 1968
Paul Frankel, Chair
Louis Kountouris
Guy T. Barone     

Adrian P. Cimerman                          

Time:  0:53:09
April 9, 1953 – November 18, 2022
Admission to bar:  May 7, 1979
Lorin Zaner, Chair
Charles Boss
Michael Zychowicz

Frank S. Merritt                                 

Time:  0:55:22
October 25, 1943 – December 8, 2022
Admission to bar:  November 2, 1968
Kenneth Kilbert, Chair
Bruce Kennedy
James Klein

Jane F. Bihn                                       

Time:  1:00:11
July 27, 1959 – December 13, 2022
Admission to bar:  November 1, 1983
Catherine Garcia-Feehan, Chair
Bonnie R. Rankin

Angelia Diane Bell                            

Time:  1:01:52
November 11, 1949 – December 18, 2022
Admission to bar: May 13, 1985
Twila Ferguson, Chair
Lafayette E. Tolliver
Members of the Toledo Junior Bar Association

Donna Mae Weaver                           

Time:  1:03:24
August 6, 1945 – December 20, 2022
Admission to bar:  November 15, 1982
H. Buswell Roberts, Jr., Chair
David Arnold
Paul Belazis
Deborah Spychalski

Charles R. Aschemeier                      

Time:  1:06:15
July 17, 1947 – January 4, 2023
Admission to bar:  November 7, 1975
Jack P. Viren, Chair
Robert J. Gilmer, Jr.
Ray Beebe

Robert Z. Kaplan                               

Time:  1:09:56
November 16, 1928 – January 15, 2023
Admission to bar: March 23, 1955
Richard Walinski, Chair
Samuel Kaplan
Fritz Byers
Jon Richardson
Peter Rost
John Barron

Philip M. Rice                                    

Time:  1:17:19
December 28, 1931 – January 16, 2023
Admission to bar:  May 16, 1962
Charles R. Schaub, Chair
Richard D. Emch
Patrick P. Pacella

Steven Timonere                                

Time:  1:20:02
January 9, 1931 – February 6, 2023
Admission to bar:  August 31, 1955
Jennifer Bainbridge, Chair
Michael Hyrne
John Borell

James E. Tierney                                

Time:  1:25:15
January 15, 1957 – February 6, 2023
Admission to bar: 1982
Benjamin Barros, Chair
Lee A. Pizzimenti
Rhoda Berkowitz

Edward F. Weber                               

Time:  1:28:24
July 26, 1931 – February 27, 2023
Admission to bar: September 5, 1956
Ford Weber, Chair
Jude Aubry
Craig Frederickson

George L. Chapman, III                    

Time:  1:32:46
May 18, 1947 – March 15, 2023
Admission to bar: November 2, 1979
Reginald S. Jackson, Jr., Chair
David F. Waterman
Lynn E. Olman

Ned Stevens Newcomer                    

Time:  1:35:37
March 1, 1943 – March 16, 2023
Admission to bar:  November 2, 1968
Thomas McCarter, Chair

Mark A. Conrad                                 

Time:  1:38:48
August 20, 1953 – March 25, 2023
Admission to bar: May 9, 1983
Paul Radon, Chair
Stuart Cubbon
Joseph Dawson

Justice “Judd” G. Johnson, Jr.           

Time:  1:43:38
January 2, 1939 – April 5, 2023
Admission to bar: October 17, 1964
Thomas W. Palmer, Chair
Donald F. Melhorn, Jr.
David O’Connell
Roman Arce

Spiros P. Cocoves                              

Time:  1:46:28
December 7, 1953 – May 17, 2023
Admission to bar:  November 4, 1985
Mark Geudtner, Chair
Hon. Jeffrey J. Helmick
Jon Richardson
 

DOWNLOAD PROGRAM

 

 


Previous • Page 8 of 16 • Next

FRIENDS OF THE TBA

See All Sponsors