ChatGPT is a powerful language generation model developed by OpenAI. It is capable of generating human-like text based on a given prompt. It can be used for a variety of tasks such as writing articles, composing emails, and even coding. Since its inception, ChatGPT has seen a significant increase in usage across various industries, particularly in the field of legal research and writing, where it is being used to assist attorneys in drafting documents, researching case law, and summarizing complex legal concepts.
That’s a pretty good opening paragraph, but unfortunately I did not write it. ChatGPT wrote the paragraph in response to my question: “Can you write an introductory paragraph to tell the readers of a Toledo Bar journal who are mostly but not exclusively practicing lawyers what Chat GPS is and can do and what is the increase in usage since Chat GPS started?” It took ChatGPT less than 10 seconds to write the first paragraph. It actually took longer for me to write the question, which had a few errors.
So I took ChatGPT up on its assertion that it was being used “…to assist attorneys in drafting documents, researching case law, and summarizing complex legal concepts” with some test queries.
ChatGPT failed the first query, because it was unavailable when I first logged in. The popularity of the free service at this point outpaces its capacity, and when I first tried to enter a query, it told me it could not process my request because it lacked the capacity. It asked me to leave my email and it would email me when it had capacity. By the afternoon, no email had come, so I tried again, and again it said it lacked capacity. So regardless of how good it is, at the moment it lacks accessibility and thus reliability. When I finally was able to submit queries in the evening, it at times could not produce any answers. It never did send the promised email that it had capacity.
When I finally gained access, I asked an analytical question I thought that it would be able to handle: “Which Ohio Supreme Court Justice sided with the defendant the most in a civil case?” It could not handle this query, responding the first time that it couldn’t answer the question and the second time I tried, with slightly different terms, it gave me an error message.
I then asked what the law in Ohio is regarding caps on damages in a civil case. The answer failed to distinguish between economic damages that are not capped and non-economic damages which are (subject to some exceptions) pursuant to R.C. 2315.18. Since that distinction was critical to the analysis, I think that ChatGPT failed to give appropriate legal advice and probably worse for lawyers, might arm clients with half-baked legal theories that unfortunately might have an additional aura of authority of having been produced by artificial intelligence. This may make the client conversation a bit more difficult.
ChatGPT also failed a statute of limitations question, stating that the claim for damages to real property was 15 years, an answer which is wrong by 11 years. R.C.2305.09. Google’s first answer to that same question got that one right and even gave the correct citation and a link to nolo.com for a more helpful context.
But there were some tasks that ChatGPT did very well. I asked it to “Draft a business letter to attorney John Smith with a regarding section about the case of Jones v. XYZ company and tell him that I am enclosing discovery and that if he has any questions he should call me. Put this on a letterhead form that lists Brian A. Newberg, Attorney 16410 West River Road, Bowling Green, Ohio 43402 and have a signature line and space for Brian to sign.” The response took just about 10 seconds and was remarkable, with no typos and with formatting that allowed me to easily cut and paste it into a word processing program, add the attorney’s address and send. It even added an “Enclosure:” at the bottom of the page although I did not tell it to.
Last, I asked it to “write a letter to a landlord from a tenant about a leaking pipe and lack of electrical power due to that leak and that they needed to fix citing the Ohio Landlord tenant act with statute numbers or the tenants would seek to terminate the lease pursuant to whatever statute or law that would allow the breaking of the lease.” The letter ChatGPT produced was remarkably good, with proper formatting and the correct statutory citation, so that it read as if it were written by an attorney. It was four paragraphs and had no typos and would have required me to make no substantive changes to the document. All I would have needed to do is add in the addressees of the landlord and the tenant’s address and it was ready to sign and send.
So in summary, for substantive legal analysis, ChatGPT was not helpful to me and caused concern that it might lead the practitioner (or clients) down the wrong road. However, when ChatGPT was available, it was certainly up to the task of drafting the day-to-day letters that a lawyer has to generate. I suspect the capacity problems will be resolved and that attorneys will start to use the system for simple letters and possibly more, if it improves as is promised and remains free for users.
The text of the letters generated by ChatGPT and referenced in this article can be found below.
[Your Company Letterhead]
January 20, 2023
John Smith, Esq.
[Attorney's Address]
Dear Mr. Smith,
I am writing to you in regards to the case of Jones v. XYZ Company. Enclosed with this letter, you will find the discovery related to the case. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call me at [Your Contact Number].
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
[Your Signature]
Brian A. Newberg
16410 West River Road
Bowling Green, Ohio 43402
[Your Contact Information]
Enclosures: Discovery related to Jones v. XYZ Company
Proof of landlord letter
Your Name & Address]
[Landlord's Name & Address]
Date
Subject: Leaking Pipe and Lack of Electrical Power
Dear [Landlord's Name],
I am writing to inform you of a serious issue that has arisen in the rental property located at [Your Address]. As you are aware, there is a leaking pipe in the [specific room or area] that has caused a lack of electrical power in the same room. The leak and the resulting power outage have caused significant inconvenience and damage to my property.
As per the Ohio Landlord Tenant Act, Section 5321.04, the landlord is responsible for maintaining the property in a fit and habitable condition (ORC 5321.04 (A)(3)) and the failure to do so constitutes a violation of the lease agreement. In addition, Section 5321.07 (B) states that the tenant may terminate the lease if the landlord fails to comply with the duty to maintain the property in a fit and habitable condition.
I kindly request that you take immediate action to repair the leaking pipe and restore the electrical power as soon as possible. If the repairs are not made within a reasonable time frame, I will be forced to seek legal remedies, including termination of the lease agreement.
Please let me know the schedule for the repairs and if there is anything I can do to assist in the process.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
Tenant
cc: [Any other relevant parties]
Encl: [Any relevant documents]